Agriculture Policy Briefing

There are no “Compelling Arguments” against GM Mustard, and GM Crops, Mint Tells Minister Harsh Vardhan

Environment minister Harsh Vardhan  inaugurating a gym in a park in Delhi on 17 September, 2017. PIB photo.

The Mint newspaper has criticised the government for waffling on the issue of GM mustard before the Supreme Court last week. Despite the court telling it in an earlier hearing to make its stand clear, the government again said it was studying the matter and had not made up its mind on release of the GM mustard hybrid, DMH-11, for commercial cultivation. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), under the ministry of environment, had on 11 May recommended to the government that the hybrid was safe for cultivation by farmers and it should approve its release.

The newspaper finds environment minister Harsh Vardhan wishy-washy for saying the government would take a decision “based on common good,” as if the GEAC, which is under his ministry, was acting otherwise. He said there were “compelling arguments” both for and against GM crops, when there are not.  The arguments put forth by the anti-GM lobby, which has moved the Supreme Court against release of DMH-11, are vituperative, false, shrill and misleading. They are not compelling.

The newspaper finds the advice of the parliamentary committee to the government to go slow on release of DMH-11 “decidedly odd,” because six institutes of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) had told the panel headed by Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury that they had found GM crops safe for animal health.  The National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad had additionally told the committee that it had tested GM food for toxicity and allegenicity and found no adverse effects. Yet the panel chose to ignore the scientific evidence and adopted the stance of the anti-GM activists as its own.

Mint says 185 million hectares of land in 26 countries are under GM crops. They are being cultivated by 18 million farmers. At least 30 countries import GM produce, it says, which means nearly 68 percent of the world’s population is already consuming GM products.

“Simply put,” Mint says, “GM crops make for good science and good economics, and India needs to embrace both. If it doesn’t, it will fall behind.”

(No Time to Decide on GM Mustard: Minister Harsh Vardhan inaugurating a park-gym in Delhi on 17 September, 2017. Photo courtesy PIB).

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?