Agriculture Policy Biodiversity

Organic Agriculture’s Seductive Profits May be Elusive For Smallholder Indian Farmers

Sathya Raghu, the author of this article, is a chartered accountant and worked with PriceWaterhouseCoopers, a consultancy. In 2009 he quit the job and took a shine to agriculture. With friends he set up Cosmos Green and grew guar beans in Raichur, Karnataka. Currently, he works with a 250-member farmer producer company in Shahabad which supplies to organic food stores in Hyderabad. He is also engaged with about 15 farmer producer companies.

Reshma, a 22-year-old smallholder farmer outside Hyderabad, nourishes her farm with cow dung hoping to get a good yield. She is among a growing number of farmers in India who have shifted from conventional to organic farming in anticipation of premium returns and healthy farms. They have substituted chemical fertilizers with natural materials like neem cake and cow dung. Instead of chemical sprays they use bio-pesticides like neem oil. They want to compete in the global market for organic produce, which is worth about $64 billion.

Sathya Raghu

Sathya Raghu

To her rude surprise, Reshma’s yields dropped to half in the first year and her profit fell to less than a one tenth of what she made before the switch. The second year saw a marginal increase in yield; her savings improved to about a third of the pre-organic returns. She is yet to get the premium she hoped for as her farm is not yet wholly “organic.”

Inputs for organic farming are cheaper but farmers who are new to it need elaborate guidance. Talk of sustainable agriculture is fine, but what use is it to Reshma if she cannot earn enough for two square meals a day?

Organic farming promises a lot: it reduces the detrimental effects of conventional chemical-based farming while cutting input costs, fetching a premium price for produce, improving soil fertility, promoting efficient use of water, and providing safe food for consumers. But having worked closely with 8,000 farmers like Reshma in different capacities, I know the reality does not measure up to the promise.

While it has a place in Indian agriculture, organic farming is not a viable option for smallholder farmers. Imposing it on them, I believe, can do more harm than good.

First let’s address the claim that organic farmers will get higher returns as a result of lower costs and higher prices. While inputs like bio-fertilizers and manure are indeed cheaper than chemical substitutes, we should not ignore the true costs and risks involved.

In the initial years yields will typically plummet because of lower yield. The lost income cancels out the savings from cheaper inputs. After detoxing the soil, which takes up to three years, farmers will have to pay the equivalent of $450-600 (Rs 30,000-40,000) a year to obtain organic certification. This is a significant cost for farmers like Reshma who hope to earn about $100-120 (Rs 6,500-8,000) a month. During the transition, farmers cannot get premium rates because their farms are not fully “organic.”

Organic farmers are dependent on niche urban and export markets.  To access these, they have to tie-up with large companies who will skim much of the premium price retailers will pay. To retain a larger share of the retail price, smallholder farmers will have to form collectives to enhance their bargaining power with sellers of inputs, lenders of credit or buyers of produce. State help will be needed. The government has a scheme to subsidise the cost of certification for small groups of organic farmers. That is a good move.

Organic farming is supposed to be inherently safer and healthier. But because the industry is young and not well-regulated in India, not-so-safe practices are followed. For example, farmyard manure may contain toxic chemicals and heavy metals. Certain plant sprays, such as datura flower and leaf spray, have atropine which can act on the nervous system. If applied indiscriminately, it can even cause cardiac arrest and paralysis.

An Alternative

There is a lot that can be done to make food safe and farming sustainable without going fully organic.  Farmers should be educated to use prescribed agro-chemicals in specified doses and within safe time lines (say, not too close to harvesting).  Instead of pushing farmers like Reshma to risk it all with organic farming,  we need to strike a middle path. That way farmers can thrive without harming human and animal health and damaging the environment.

(Top photo of an organic ladyfinger farm at Madanapalli in Mysuru district by Vivian Fernandes)

(The author can be reached on

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?