Agri-biotechnology Agriculture Policy

NSAI Seeking to Steal Patented Traits, Breach Contracts, says ABLE-AG

Paresh Vema, Head of ABLE-Ag's Management Committee. Photo by Vivian Fernandes

The Association of Biotech-Led Enterprises (Agriculture Focus Group) or ABLE-AG says the National Seed Association of India (NSAI) is creating confusion about protections available under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act (PPVFRA) and Indian Patent Act (IPA) to innovations in agriculture. It charges NSAI with propagating misleading views ‘at the behest of parties that are seeking to misappropriate patented technologies and avoid contractual obligations.’

‘It is important to distinguish the scope and ambit of PPVFRA and IPA. PPVFRA, inter alia, is to accord protection to novel, distinct, useful and stable plant varieties that are developed by a breeder or a farmer using diverse germplasm,’ says Paresh Verma, Head of ABLE-AG’s Management Committee. ‘Nowhere does PPVFRA allude to or aim to cover innovative biotechnology, chemistry or other extraneous methods of crop improvement. In particular, PPVFRA does not apply to innovative biotechnology or the development of new transgenic plants with advantageous features that do not otherwise exist in nature and such inventions are in the domain of IPA’, contends Verma.

In ABLE-AG’s view, PPVFRA, like similar legislation in other countries, permits a breeder to use protected varieties to develop newer ones. This exemption is intended only for research purposes.  It does permit commercial use by seed companies of biotechnologies protected under the Indian Patent Act, as NSAI asserts.

NSAI’s suggestion that a benefit sharing fund can be a mechanism for compensating agri-biotechnology innovators are ‘speculative’ says Shivendra Bajaj, Executive Director, ABLE-AG. ‘This assertion is entirely misleading and corrupts the purpose behind the benefit-sharing provisions in PVPFRA,’ which, he says, is meant to reward communities for conserving biodiversity. ‘To compensate owners of patented technologies through this mechanism is a clear misrepresentation of law,’ he says. NSAI’s aim, according to Bajaj, is to ‘expropriate patented technologies for purely commercial gains’ and not to conduct research with a view to improving them.

ABLE-AG says the patent act recognizes the need to encourage research and innovation in the area of biotechnology and gives protection to novel microbial, recombinant DNA, protein and RNA technologies that are not only applicable in agriculture but also in pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, industrial and environmental applications.

PPVFRA and IPA protect distinct rights and are meant to co-exist, says ABLE-AG. NSAI is challenging this understanding which has prevailed over the past 10 years, it says, to enable the ‘greed of certain seed companies attempting to expropriate intellectual property for crass commercial gains, masquerading as farmers’ interest’.

(Top photo: Paresh Verma, Head of ABLE-AG’s Management Committee.  Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

 

Email This Page

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?