Agriculture Policy Briefing Contract farming

NITI Aayog’s Ramesh Chand Wants Agricultural Marketing in Concurrent List

Ramesh Chand, photo by Vivian Fernandes.

“It is imperative to bring agricultural marketing into the Concurrent or Union list and implement a national-level model market act,” writes NITI Aayog member Ramesh Chand in a co-authored article  with Jaspal Singh in the Indian Express.

Chand believes that price volatility and unprofitable prices for farm produce can be addressed through competitive markets, which can give farmers higher than support prices (MSPs) provided markets are efficient.

He cites the case of onions dropping to Rs 200 a quintal in Madhya Pradesh in May but selling for Rs 700 a quintal in neighbouring Uttar Pradesh.  By August onions were selling for Rs 800 a quintal in MP mandis and for Rs 2,000 a quintal in Delhi’s wholesale markets.  If markets were integrated there would have been efficient movement of onions from the regions of glut to those of scarcity and prices would have equalized. If they were temporarily stored, the spike between prices in May and August would not have been so sharp.

Chand says states have been slow in implementing market reforms: removing restrictions imposed by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, facilitating private sector participation and investment in agricultural markets, promoting storage and linking farmers with processors through contract farming.

Unlike agricultural economist and former chairman of the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) Ashok Gulati, Chand is not an unabashed free trader. Gulati thinks  the Essential Commodities Act and stocking limits distort the market; for Chand they “rule out the possibility of the private sector mopping up more than the normal marketed surplus.”

Chand also sees a role for buffer stocks. Free traders like Gulati and former agriculture secretary M S Gill used to say that food security was not grain in warehouses but dollars in the treasury. But that hypothesis was severely tested during the global food crisis of 2008 when countries clamped down on food exports. India did not have to worry because of sufficient stocks when there were bread riots in countries like Egypt that relied on imports. “It was due to this policy of maintaining buffer stocks that India ensured remarkable price stability during the global food crisis,” Chand writes.

Free traders think buffer stocking is a more expensive way of achieving price stability. Governments are good at hoarding but they are quite inept at offloading the stored grains. Huge losses are caused by improper storage and rodent infestation. They also offer opportunities for corruption.

“Experience, however, shows that trade is often more expensive,” writes Chand. Last year buffer stocking was extended from rice and wheat to pulses. There was a 40 percent rise in the production of pulses as a whole, and 87 percent increase in the output of pigeonpea or tur. This kind of glut would have caused prices to crash; they did decline below support prices but the fall was cushioned by the government buying 14.7 lakh tonnes of kharif pulses.

Chand says till the mid-2000s, output growth drove the price trend. But over the past 10 years, price trends have driven output growth owing to the declining influence of non-price factors like technology, irrigation and extension.

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?