Agri-biotechnology Briefing

Keshav Raj Kranthi Leaves CICR His Goal Of Making Desi Cotton Stage a Comeback Unfulfilled

K R Kranthi at Faridkot cotton station

As Keshav Raj Kranthi bids adieu to the Central Institute of Cotton Research, Vivian Fernnades reports on the director who could not digest the eclipse of the public sector in the lives of cotton farmers.

Keshav Raj Kranthi bid farewell to the Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR) on Wednesday, 15 March, after being its director for nine years. He has taken voluntary retirement to join the International Cotton Advisory Committee in Washington D.C where he will be heading the technical information services division.

“The cotton economy changed dramatically,” during his tenure as head of CICR, Nagpur, Kranthi said over the telephone. Control over the crop shifted from the public sector to the private sector, he said, because of genetically-modified Bt cotton, where private trait and seed companies held sway. This resulted in a “mismatch,” he said, between “commercial considerations and research recommendations.”

Kranthi had a number of issues with Bt cotton. First of all, the genetically-modified trait that was toxic to bollworms could only be implanted in American cotton, which not being native to India, was susceptible to pests and diseases unlike native, Asiatic or desi cottons.

Secondly, to profit from their research investment in insecticidal Bt traits, private companies had to promote hybrids, whose seeds had to be purchased year after year. A part of the price which farmers paid was trait fee. In countries like the United States, the insecticidal trait was available in varieties whose seed farmers could save to sow the next season.  But intellectual property law in the US allows trait developers to charge farmers for such seeds, unlike India.

Hybrids were not suitable for dry lands, which account for most of India’s cotton area, as they require more fertilizer to be applied. Farmers also went in for multiple pickings to defray the cost of seed and inputs. This allowed pests like pink bollworms to infest the crop.  Long duration also increased the crop’s vulnerability to adverse weather conditions.

Kranthi believed that the Bt cotton revolution which began in 2002, was a transient phenomenon. For India’s cotton economy to be sustainable, the crop had to be of short duration and early maturing. This would obviate the need for the seeds to be impregnated with the insecticidal Bt trait.  But to ensure that farmers earned as much from a single picking as they did from multiple pickings of hybrid cotton, they would have to go in for high density planting.

Though the idea seemed good, Kranthi was not able to convince farmers ─ at least not in the numbers that could make a difference. He did involve some NGOs to demonstrate high density planting of short duration native varieties in the Vidarbha region over the past three seasons,  but the number  of farmers involved was too small to be of persuasive value.

As he leaves for Washington DC, his call to Indian farmers “to wake up and help desi cotton get back its lost kingdom, and through it so shall our brethren regain back our roots to reach the sky,” remains a plaintive cry.

(Top photo of Keshav Raj Kranthi, Director, CICR at Faridkot cotton research station, September, 2016. By Vivian Fernandes). 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?