Agri-biotechnology GM Crops

India Must Seize the Chance as Nobel Laureates Tell Greenpeace to Stop Anti-GMO Campaign

Estranged founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, campaigning for Golden Rice and against Greenpeace in New Delhi in March 2015. Photo by  Vivian Fernandes.

More than a hundred Nobel prize winners have said there is not a single case of GM crops harming humans, animals or the environment. The have told Greenpeace to ‘cease and desist’ from its negative campaigns. Activists who want India to be GMO free must listen. And regulators must show leadership, says Vivian Fernandes.

One hundred and ten Nobel laureates have urged Greenpeace and its supporters to abandon their campaign against genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in general and Vitamin-A enriched Golden Rice in particular.
They have called upon Greenpeace to ‘cease and desist’ in its campaign and have demanded that governments ‘reject’ Greenpeace’s campaign. They have vowed ‘to do everything in their power to oppose Greenpeace’s actions and accelerate the access of farmers to all the tools of modern biology, especially seeds improved through biotechnology.’  The Nobel prize winners say, ‘Opposition based on emotion and dogma contradicted by data must be stopped.’

The signatories to the letter say ‘scientific and regulatory agencies around the world have repeatedly and consistently found crops and foods improved through biotechnology to be as safe as, if not safer than those derived from any other method of production. There has never been a single confirmed case of a negative health outcome for humans or animals from their consumption. Their environmental impacts have been shown repeatedly to be less damaging to the environment, and a boon to global biodiversity.’

This website urges eminent Indian scientists to emulate the Nobel laureates. Some of them like M S Swaminathan have been vacillating. Some others have fed anti-GM sentiment out of professional jealously or with an eye on office, tailoring their views to suit the swadeshi outlook of ideologues in the ruling coalition.

The time for equivocation is over. Regulators, particularly environment minister Prakash Javadekar, must waste no time in approving genetically-modified mustard, whose bio-safety, has been established. Indian agri-biotechnology researchers, in public sector institutes and private sector companies, have waited without hope in sight for GM seeds to be approved, even as Indian farmers cry out for them.  Money has been wasted, young talent has been turned away, and investments have turned sour. Some companies have given up. They have either closed down agri-biotechnology departments or pruned them.

India must learn from its Bt cotton experience, which farmers have handsomely approved. In many crops there is no option other than genetic modification to confer resistance to pests (see GM endorsements on this site). India must approve or take resolute steps towards approving herbicide-tolerant cotton, insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant soybean, GM maize, Bt pigeonpea, Bt brinjal, and beta carotene-fortified Golden Rice.

Click here to read Nobel laureates’ letter 

(Top photo of Patrick Moore, estranged founder of Greenpeace at a Paharganj, Delhi, hotel in March 2015 while on a visit to India to campaign for Golden Rice and against Greenpeace. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

Read Manu Joseph’s insightful piece in the Hindustan Times


Email This Page

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?