Agriculture Policy Briefing

Food Price Inflation Should Be Fought With Sound Policies, Not Policing

Vegetable market at Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar. Photo by Vivian Fernandes

In a piece written for Swarajya magazine, Vivian Fernandes cautions against using the vocabulary and instruments of the pre-economic liberalization days to combat food price inflation.

At a meeting on 7 June to check food price inflation, the consumer affairs ministry announced a slew of measures. Many of them seem more like an attempt to manage the headlines than calm prices. States were told to assume responsibility. The focus was on police action. Threats were issued to hoarders and black marketers to behave or else.

Already stocking limits have been lowered. Is stocking in anticipation of a price rise, termed as hoarding, necessarily a bad thing? Is selling at a higher price when supplies run thin black marketing?  By stocking for the future, are not traders helping even out prices and making supplies available? Police action will only increase harassment of traders and increase the cost of trade.

The government has a tendency to whip private players for its own inability to cope. Earlier this year we saw the agriculture ministry get into a partisan fight with a multinational supplier of popular Bt cottonseed technology. Despite there being no demand from farmers’ organizations, except a few that act on command from the government, Bt cottonseed was brought under price control nationally. Using the Essential Commodities Act, the patent for the technology was set aside, only for the order to be suspended five days later.

We are now told that price monitoring cells are being strengthened, as if they are concrete pillars that need reinforcement.  Are government departments agile enough to order imports or allow exports when prices rise or fall below a threshold?

Tomatoes in Delhi are retailing for between Rs 40 and Rs 70 a kg depending on colour and quality. Price of potatoes range from Rs 22 a kg to Rs 40.  Onions are selling for Rs 30 a kg. These are aberrations.

Governments must not add to the panic with jerky reactions. As former Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu says in his latest book: ’A big hindrance to good policy is public opinion…. Often the right policies do not get adopted not because policymakers do not know what these are, but out of a fear that the people (his italics) will object to them. It follows that an important task of those at the helm of a nation is to educate the general public so that the popular opinion is founded in reason and knowledge, and, by implication, policies that are chosen are better.’

Pravesh Sharma, former MD of the Small Farmers Agribusiness Consortium, a government agency that promotes farmers’ producer companies says high summer temperatures are responsible for the rise in tomato prices and with one or two showers, prices will fall. He should know because he is getting into the distribution of fresh fruits and vegetables in Delhi to begin with, in about a month.

Potato prices last year had slumped because of a glut. This year’s rise should not be grudged. Only when farmers make a profit will they have an incentive to grow.

A better way to control food prices is to encourage domestic production. The government must promote contract farming by allowing farmers to sell to whoever they want and not only through regulated mandis. A model agricultural marketing law was drafted in 2003. But many states have either not amended the law, or the amendments are inadequate. Traders in Vashi, Mumbai’s wholesale market, are currently protesting against the state government’s move to remove fruits and vegetables from the list of items that must be mandatorily sold through mandis. In 2011, the Karnataka government cancelled the license of Metro Cash and Carry, a German wholesaler, to trade in over a hundred agricultural items. The traders said they had no objection to the company selling fruits, vegetables, fish and meat but not cereals and pulses.

Contract farming takes care of the price risk. This correspondent saw it work splendidly last year in Gujarat and West Bengal with potato farmers who had contracted to sell to McCain and Pepsico respectively. They got Rs 8 a kg against the open market price of Rs 2 a kg.

But suspicion of the private sector and arbitrary government behaviour can have a chilling effect.  In West Bengal, contract farming is dressed up as ‘contact farming’ or ‘collaborative farming’ in deference to political sensitivities.  Simplot, an American multinational, which supplies potato products to McDonalds and also sells them on its own, said it decided not to get into contract farming with potato growers in West Bengal to feed a plant it intended to set up in North India, after the state banned exports of potatoes to other states in 2012, following a shortage.

Competition among discount chains and e-commerce companies should boost contract farming of fruits and vegetables. A large number of farmer producer companies are coming up. They are good at producing but not at marketing. In Coimbatore, the Kovai Farmers’ Producer Company had over 520 members, when this correspondent met its members last year. They produced about 50 tonnes of vegetables daily for supply to Kerala. The amount was large enough for traders to queue up and pay them higher than mandi prices. If such collectives tie up with discount chains, the marketing aspect will be taken care of.

Mother Dairy has such arrangements with farmers associations. It provides them agronomic advice and educates them about pesticide use and the right ripening techniques.

We need to have contract farming for pulses as well.  The National Dairy Development Board’s Chairman T Nandkumar told this correspondent in December that it intended to sell pulses procured from farmers’ collectives. More cooperatives and companies should be encouraged with tax incentives if necessary. Though the prices of pulses are high, farmers do not get a share of it as they sell soon after the harvest when rates are low.  High minimum support prices plus bonus, mean little because the government does not procure pulses as they are not supplied through ration shops.

If farmers got into contract farming arrangements, they will nurture the crops.  One or two supplementary irrigations during times of moisture stress can greatly increase productivity. Though pulses do not need much water, they tend to be neglected.

Government policies are also inimical. Urea is subsidized, but pulses crops do not need urea as they absorb nitrogen from the air and store them in soil. They need potassium and phosphate, which are sold at open market prices.

With the right policies we can manage food prices. We do not need to go to Africa to produce pulses. We can produce enough here. And that will also obviate the need for policing.

(Top photo of vegetable market at Pusa in Bihar’s Samastipur district by Vivian Fernandes)

Link to article in Swarajya magazine

Business Standard editorial of 23 June, 2016 endorses comments made above. 

Email This Page

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?