Agriculture Policy Briefing

Fine Start to Soil Health Mission: 90 Percent of Sample Target Achieved, but Testing Lags

The government wants to make testing for soil health a habit with farmers. About 90 lakh samples have been collected but enthusiastic officials in the agriculture ministry are keen to ensure that all the country’s holdings are mapped by end of next March, reports Vivian Fernandes.

Quietly, beyond the glare of publicity, the agriculture ministry has nearly achieved the soil health testing target for the financial year just gone by. By the end of March, 90 percent of the target of ten million samples had been collected, though only 60 percent of them had been tested because many laboratories are not equipped to analyse some of the parameters.
Like the annual body check up, the government wants farmers to make soil testing every two years a habit, joint secretary Rani Kumudini said.
Several state governments have been running soil health programmes, but the National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture has standardized the processes and also increased the number of testing parameters to twelve. Besides testing for acidity, alkalinity, organic carbon, nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous, the soil health cards also have entries for secondary and micro nutrients like sulphur, zinc, boron, iron, copper and manganese. Recommendations to farmers are made based on the deficiencies and the crops cultivated.
The sampling is being done in ten hectare and 2.5 hectare grids for rain-fed and irrigated areas respectively. More samples are being taken from irrigated areas because the intensity of cultivation and multiple cropping hastens the pace of nutrient depletion.
In all 2.53 cr holdings will have to be sampled to cover the country’s 14 cr holdings as estimated by the agriculture census of 2011. This will have to be done every two years because soil health is not constant. The target for the first year was lowered to 1 cr holdings as many of the country’s 1,539 soil testing laboratories are dysfunctional and only 590 of them can test for micro-nutrients. This limits the capacity to six lakh samples a month or 72 lakh a year, Kumudini said
The central government is encouraging states to set up soil testing laboratories by paying 25 percent of the capital cost. This is small relief because states also have to bear the recurring cost of salaries and wages, equipment maintenance, rentals and reagents.
Some state governments have entered into public private partnerships, where private parties are allowed to use government laboratories and are paid Rs 190 per sample. Kumudini says Gujarat is a pioneer and has tie-ups with chemistry colleges and sugar factories.
A new policy to financially assist states in setting up mini-labs is being drafted. When this conversation was held mid-March, it had been approved by the agriculture secretary. The mini-lab has been developed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. It costs Rs 1 lakh each. It gives results promptly. Educated village youth and small groups of farmers are expected to install them, attracted by the subsidy of 80 percent.
Given the number of labs, there should be at least two labs in each of the 660 districts. That is not the case. Some of them are ill-served.
The data with GPS coordinates is fed into a server. The information is available on According to the website, as of 29 March, of the target of 1.04 cr samples, 89.52 percent have been collected. States like Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Telangana, Gujarat, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim and Odisha have either met their targets or exceeded them. Bihar and Tamil Nadu are nearly there. Assam is the worst performer. It has met just a quarter of its sample collection target. Karnataka has also been a laggard because of glitches in rolling out its ambitious programme. It did not make headway in outsourcing sample collection, and decided to do it own after floating a tender. Consequently, it has collected only 49 percent of the samples it should have.
Countrywide,  60 percent of samples have been tested, but Andhra Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim and Gujarat have met their targets.

(Top photo: Agriculture Minister Radha Mohan launching the National Soil Health Management web portal on 15 July, 2015. Courtesy: PIB) 

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?