Briefing

Drought Gives Resonance To Kelkar Committee’s 2013 Report on Marathwada

An expert committee had recommended that shifting 2.1 lakh hectares of sugarcane in Marathwada to drip irrigation would save enough water to provide protective irrigation for 15 lakh ha of rain-fed crops like pigeonpea. It had suggested other measures as well to augment water supply and minimize the impact of a drought. Vivian Fernandes revisits the Vijay Kelkar report of 2013.

Shifting Marathwada’s sugarcane and horticulture crops to drip irrigation, extensive watershed development, correcting regional skew in water use, and a new command area development authority for water resource management were some of the recommendations made by Maharashtra’s high level committee on correcting regional economic imbalances in its 2013 report.

Latur-Mangal-Sonwane

Mangal Sonwane at a water queue at Latur’s Vivekananda Chowk on 15 April, 2016. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

The committee was headed by economist and former finance secretary Vijay Kelkar.

If Marathwada’s sugarcane crop were fully drip irrigated, 15 lakh hectares (ha) of rain-fed crop could get protective irrigation. Their yields would improve along with farm incomes. The committee estimated the cost of subsidizing the transition at Rs 1,480 crore. Marathwada has 2.1 lakh ha under sugarcane compared to 6.7 lakh ha in western Maharashtra, the sugar belt.

(But B B Thombare, President of Western Indian Sugar Mills Association told Mint , ‘It is a misconception that sugar cane needs more water than other crops.’ Sugarcane is a 12-18 month crop. It consumes 15 million litres per hectare over one year. On drip irrigation, the consumption falls to 7.5 million. Flow meters installed by his sugar mill found that cotton and chick pea on drip irrigation consumed 7-8 million litres over a shorter period. Bakshi Ram, Director of Coimbatore-based Sugarcane Breeding Institute of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) said there was no correlation between sugarcane cultivation and the drought in Marathwada, which he attributed to low rainfall. But he misses the point: sugarcane does not cause the drought; it aggravates the impact).

Shifting the region’s horticultural crops on 3.68 lakh ha to drip irrigation would need Rs 1,067 cr, the committee said.

Marathwada is reeling under back-to-back droughts, a 42 percent deficit in rainfall in 2014 followed by a 40 percent reduction in 2015.

The Godavari in Beed. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

The Godavari in Beed mid-April 2016. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

If pigeonpea or tur grown on 5.24 lakh ha got two protective irrigations, the productivity of 750 kg/ha would double, the committee said. Pigeonpea needs very little water but also gets little care from farmers.

If cotton, grown on 11 lakh ha in the region could be relieved of moisture stress during the months of August to October, yields and incomes would rise. Subsidy on micro irrigation to the extent of 90 percent was ‘desirable’ the committee said for sustainability of cotton production in the rain-fed area.

Though soybean needs little water, it cannot withstand a dry spell of more than fifteen days. The 2015 kharif crop withered because there was practically no rain during the crucial month of July. With sprinkler irrigation, fluctuations in the region’s yields (1,700 kg/ha on average) could be minimised. Marathwada has 8.3 lakh ha under soybean.

The yield of chickpea or chana (800 kg/ha) which is grown on 4.40 lakh ha in the region could double with sprinkler irrigation, the committee said.

An enduring solution to the water crisis in Marathwada and Vidarbha lies in the state’s imbalanced use being corrected. Konkan was the most prodigal: eleven percent of the state’s water irrigated just 3 percent of its crop area. Western Maharashtra followed with 47 percent and 36 percent respectively. In Vidarbha, 30 percent of crop area claimed 28 percent of water. Marathwada was the most frugal with 31 percent crop area consuming just 14 percent of the state’s water.  ‘There is a need to revisit regional water use by providing proportionate share of water to deficit areas,’ the committee said.

Scramble for water at a cattle camp in Beed

Scramble for water at a cattle camp in Beed on 15 April, 2016. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

(The question is, can surplus water from say, Konkan, be moved economically to Marathwada?)

Though Marathwada uses less water, it is wasteful in another respect. Its canals irrigate 4.13 lakh ha or 38 percent of 10.79 lakh ha they are capable of. Canal water is utilised to the extent of 76 percent in the rest o Maharashtra.

For this reason, the committee wanted the fiction of ‘irrigation potential’ to be dispensed with and actual irrigated area to be a measure for calculation of development indicators. Land would be considered as irrigated if it received water supply for at least eight months in a year.

Since Marathwada could not rely on any major irrigation project in the foreseeable future, it should develop watershed in mission mode under a dedicated authority, the committee advised.

Water sheds are proven and a technologically sound option for in situ and ex-situ conservation of water, the committee said. Of Marathwada’s 7,690 identified watersheds, 3,293 had been completed but work on 1,177 had not even started when the committee was active.

The committee recommended a New Command Area Development Authority (N-CADA) to manage the release and utilisation of water, maintenance of canals and planning of crops for water use efficiency. The construction and maintenance of dams would remain with the irrigation department

A Maharashtra Agro-engineering Company should be created by merging various schemes and their budgets for implementation of micro-irrigation and mechanization programmes.

CheckDam

A check dam in Beed district. Photo by Vivian Fernandes.

The committee wanted at least one agriculture college for each taluka and one agriculture polytechnic in a cluster of villages with one lakh population to provide trained people for new agriculture.

It recommended a Maharashtra Council of Agricultural Research on the lines of ICAR with a grant of Rs 500 cr at Aurangabad.

Recycling and reuse should be mandated across all non-irrigation uses and users of water, the committee said. In order to reduce seepage and wastage, canal water should be distributed through pipelines.

(Top photo of a cracked field in Marathwada at the height of the 2016 drought. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

 

 

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?