GM Crops

Do Not Let Greens Win The Anti-GM Battle: Mark Lynas in NYT

Bt brinjal field in Bangladesh, courtesy ISAAA.

Mark Lynas, opponent turn advocate of GM technology, writes in the New York Times that the scientific community must not allow the green movement to stand in the way.

‘In a rational world, Mr. Rahman would be receiving support from all sides. He is improving the environment and tackling poverty. Yet the visit was rushed, and my escorts from the research institute were nervous about permitting me to speak with him at all.’

That is Mark Lynas writing in the New York Times (link at end of this report) about his meeting with a Bt brinjal farmer in Bangladesh.  Lynas is an advocate of genetically-modified crop technology after being an opponent for many years. He is referring to Mohammed Rahman, a smallholder farmer in Krishnapur, about 95 km from capital Dhaka.  Rahman is one of 108 farmers in Bangladesh currently permitted to try out the new variety, which was approved for commercial cultivation in October 2013. The meeting was arranged by the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. Rahman, he says, has been able to bring down the cost of cultivation, as Bt brinjal does not require insecticide sprays against the fruit and shoot borer, and sell his produce at a premium. He has made ten harvests already. (For Bangladesh’s Bt brinjal story on this website, click here)

Lynas’ visit was hurried because of the threat of violence. The coverage of Bt brinjal in the Bangladesh press has been incendiary, he says. Activists have been forcing the government into revoking its approval and have tried to pressure farmers into uprooting their crops. Whether in India, the Philippines, Africa or Europe, the anti-GM campaign has been more successful than the denial of climate change or the efficacy of vaccination.

The scientific community is losing the battle, says Lynas. In the United States, while 88 percent of scientists surveyed by the Pew Research Centre said it was safe to eat GM food, only 37 percent of the public agreed. ‘We need the technology. We cannot let the green movement stand in its way,’ is Lynas’ concluding message to NYT readers.

Click here for NYT article. 

Photo credit: ISAAA

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?