Agricultural Subsidies Agriculture Policy GM Crops

Chief Economic Adviser Speaks Up for Trade in Animals for Slaughter, Patent Rights on Plant Traits

Photo by Vivian Fernandes

“If the terminal value of livestock assets declines it will make livestock farming uneconomical.”  That was Chief Economic Adviser, Arvind Subramanian’s camouflaged way of saying that if impediments were created in the sale of cattle and buffaloes for slaughter, the dairying industry would suffer. He had to be circumspect given the reverence that leaders of the government he serves in, have for bovines. He was referring to the rules for regulation of animal markets which the environment ministry had notified about a week ago. These says that cattle, including buffaloes, traded in animal markets cannot be slaughtered.

Subramanian said such a policy would also affect “social capital.” If the number of stray cattle increased because of the ban on trade for slaughter, the incidence of afflictions like foot and mouth diseases spreading from such abandoned and weak animals would increase.

The CEA was giving the foundation day lecture of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Delhi.

Touching on another sensitive subject, the CEA said “expropriating property rights retroactively and not respecting contracts” would harm farmers. He was perhaps referring to last year’s price control order of the agriculture ministry, which denies pricing freedom to the patent-holders of genetically-modified (GM) plant traits like insect resistance. The ministry is now trying to deny them licensing freedom as well.

The CEA said efforts have to be made to “ensure there is no abuse of monopolistic positions,” adding that India had tools like competition policy to tackle such abuses.

The cost-benefit analysis of GM crop technology must be done by farmers, he said, alluding to the tendency of anti-GM technology activists to speak for them.

Subramanian said India must love cereals less and love pulses, oilseeds, fruit and vegetables and livestock farming more. Pulses and oilseeds, he said, were socially-useful crops as they consumed less of subsidized fertilizer and also enriched the soil with nitrogen from the air. They were more nutritious too.

The CEA said agriculture needed “more hard-nosed realism than woolly romanticization of the Indian farmer.”

More people would have to give up agriculture. At the same time technology would have to make it more productive, profitable and climate resilient.

(Top photo of Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian giving the NAAS foundation day lecture. Photo by Vivian Fernandes)

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?