Agricultural Subsidies Agriculture Policy Briefing

Cheap Crop Loans are Parked in Fixed Deposits, Re-lent at Higher Rates, Say Economists

In an article in the Indian Express, agricultural economist Ashok Gulati and researcher Prerna Terway say the government’s subsidy on crop loans is being misused. The subsidy is given to banks so they can lend to farmers at seven percent. An additional three percentage point discount is given if farmers repay in time. The five percent combined subsidy effectively reduces the interest cost of crop loans to farmers who diligently repay to four percent.
But the authors suspect that the subsidy is being misused. Why? There has been a surge in agricultural credit offtake though agri-GDP growth in the last two years has averaged 0.45 percent. This suggests that farmers are borrowing cheap and putting money in fixed deposits. They may also be lending at 15-20 percent to landless cultivators who cannot borrow as they do not have title to the lands they cultivate. This is why NITI Aayog’s Tajamul Haque committee has proposed legalizing leases without owners losing title. (See story on this website). Also, there has been no decline in borrowing from non-formal sources like moneylenders. A spike in borrowing in the last quarter of the financial year when agricultural activity slows down, suggests crop loans are being diverted.
According to the authors interest subsidy deposited directly in farmers’ bank accounts would plug the ‘leakages.’ The subsidies on other inputs like fertilizers should be similarly parked. The prices of inputs should be freed. This will promote both equity and efficiency, they assert.

(Top photo: Relief cheque given to a Mathura farmer in 2015 for crop damage from a hailstorm. Credit: Vivian Fernandes)

Leave a Comment

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Y Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

F Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?