Bt technology GM Crops

Bangladesh Minister Takes on NGOs Politically; It’s an Example for India

Bt-Brinjal--India-1

By stoutly defending the country’s decision to allow Bt brinjal and asking the anti-GMO activists to explain their silence on imports of GM soyabean and GM canola, Bangladesh’s Agriculture Minister Matia Chowdhury has shown the Indian government that change cannot happen without the courage of convictions. Chowdhury rebuffed activists who said hybrids were health hazards; they have increased life expectancy, she said. Science should decide policy not prejudices writes Vivian Fernandes in a piece published by Indo-Asian News Service (IANS).

Bangladesh Agriculture Minister Matia Chowdhury has set an example by politically challenging extreme environmentalists and private-enterprise hating ideologues, which is in contrast to the arm- twisting of Greenpeace by the Indian government.

At an event in Dhaka on Thursday, Chowdhury called those protesting against Bt brinjal cultivation as either ‘devious,’ or ‘ignorant.’

‘The words are harsh but I’ve said this with responsibility,’ bdnews24.com, a website reported her as saying.

The Modi government has cut off foreign money supply to Greenpeace calling it a threat to India’s economic security, primarily for its role in fomenting tribal opposition to coal mines in forested areas. Greenpeace is opposed to nuclear energy and genetic modification (GM) crop technology.   But it has no realistic solution for India’s energy or food security needs. Depending on imported oil or renewables like solar energy is not an option. Nor is organic farming.

Instead of calling Greenpeace’s bluff with arguments, high handedness has allowed the NGO to style itself as the victim of the government’s intolerance to dissent.  Further embellishment has been provided by the government’s malicious action against Ford Foundation, which has been a force for good and is fondly remembered for its role in the Green Revolution.

Under Chowdhury’s stewardship, the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI)  allowed cultivation of Bt brinjal in October 2013, after doing its own agronomic studies but relying on Indian bio-safety data. In the first season, twenty farmers were given the seeds. They reported 70-90 percent reduction in pesticide sprays, thirty percent increase in marketable yield and a net benefit of around $650 per bigha. The brinjals were marketed as pesticide free and fetched a premium. Currently, 108 farmers there have been permitted to grow Bt brinjal, whose seeds farmers can re-use.

India’s Mahyco-Monsanto has offered the Bt technology gratis to BARI for use in open pollinating varieties. The company reserves the right to sell Bt hybrids in that country. It had a similar arrangement with the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University and the Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi under the Agricultural  Biotechnology Support Programme II run out of Cornell University.

Then environment minister Jairam Ramesh, for reasons that can be speculated, over-ruled the GEAC, India’s regulator for genetically-modified crops, and announced an indefinite moratorium. This February marked the fifth anniversary of the ban.

Civil society groups in Bangladesh have not reconciled themselves to Bt brinjal and have been quite uncivil in their protests. Mark Lynas, an opponent of GM technology turned advocate, wrote earlier this month that his meeting with Mohammed Rahman, a smallholder farmer growing Bt brinjal at Krishnapur, about a hundred km from Dhaka, happened under the overhang of violence. The meeting was arranged by BARI.  The press coverage of Bt brinjal in the Bangladesh press has been incendiary, he wrote in the New York Times; activists have been pressuring farmers into uprooting their crop.

Chowdhury’s forthrightness is in contrast to official Indian timidity. The government policy is to allow GM crops after full scientific evaluation of their bio-safety and impact, impact on the environment and on consumers, Sanjeev Kumar Balyan, MoS for Agriculture and Food Processing Industries had told the Lok Sabha last July. The government follows a policy of ‘case by case’ approvals for GM crops, he said.Bt Brinjal 2

In the same month, Minister for Environment and Forests, Prakash Javadekar told Sultanpur (UP) MP Varun Gandhi that there ‘is no proposal for a complete ban’ on release of GM organisms either for commercial cultivation or for experiments. Before any GM plant is approved for commercial cultivation, ‘extensive evaluation and regulatory approval process takes place’ he said in reply to a unstarred question in the Lok Sabha.

Javadekar told the Lok Sabha in November, that the central government had filed its objections in the Supreme Court against the ban on GM crop trials recommended by five of six members of the Technical Expert Committee which the apex court had set up in May 2012 to examine the strength of India’s regulatory mechanism. The government is of the view that ‘research in GM and confined field trials for generating bio-safety data with all due precautions should be allowed to continue in the national interest,’ Javadekar stated.

Currently, four states have allowed trials of GM crops in India. But what after that? Will the central government allow their commercial cultivation? So far only Bt cotton has been approved. That was thirteen years ago.

The anti-GM activists have no case. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has himself seen the benefits of GM technology in Gujarat. As chief minister he did not allow Bt cotton crop grown with pirated seeds to be destroyed in 2002, despite directions of the GEAC, for fear of risking farmers’ wrath. He should challenge the activists as Chowdhury has done.

Modi made some remarks about genetic engineering while launching DD Kisan channel on Tuesday. ‘How do we do do we do research in pulses? How do we do genetic engineering? How do we increase the productivity per hectare? How do we increase the protein content?’ Modi asked. The remarks were too feeble to even register with the government’s Press Information Bureau.

India imported pulses worth $2,9 billion last year. It will take a lot of research to increase the protein content of pulses, but the loss of pigeon pea (tur) and chick pea (chana) to the pod borer can be easily controlled by splicing the plants with the same gene that makes Bt cotton toxic to bollworms.

It is not Greenpeace or the Left ideologues that the government fears, but its own party affiliates like the Swadeshi Jagran Manch and the Bharatiya Kisan Sangh. All fundamentalists are alike in their extremism.

(Photos are of Bt brinjals in Indian field trials)

 

 

 

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?