GM Crops

Andhra Ag Minister Wants Compulsory Licensing of Monsanto’s Patented Cotton Technology

Balasaheb Kakde at his agro-input dealership, New Krushi Mitra Agro Agency, Ramnagar, Jalna, Maharashtra. Copyright Vivian Fernandes.

‘Acche Din’ or happy days are eluding Monsanto. Before the cotton sowing season last year, Maharashtra reduced the price of Bt cottonseed by Rs 100 a packet to provide relief to farmers hurt by low cotton prices on account of China not importing the fibre. Some franchisees, including the biggest one, reneged on royalty payments and have succeeded in lobbying the government to bring Bt cottonseed under price control centrally. They are also pushing for Monsanto’s patent to be declared ‘standard and essential’ subject to FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) terms by invocation of the compulsory licensing clause in the patent act, reports Vivian Fernandes.

Andhra Pradesh’s agriculture minister has sought compulsory licensing of Monsanto’s patented cottonseed technology on various grounds including farmers being unable to grow non-Bt cotton because of invasion by bollworms repelled from fields planted with insecticidal Bt cotton.

Prathipati Pulla Rao.  Courtesy www.youtube.com

Prathipati Pulla Rao. Courtesy www.youtube.com

In a letter to Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Nirmala Sitharaman at the beginning of February, Prathipati Pulla Rao has said the ‘grant of compulsory license’ under the patent act ‘would ensure licenses to all desiring seed companies at reasonable license fee.’ By invoking the relevant provisions of the law, ‘more seed companies and even such companies which were closed down due to pick and select policy of MMBL (Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Limited, a JV of Monsanto) will once again enter cottonseed production and distribution. This will create healthy competition to the consumers’ advantage.’

Reddy says of the annual demand of 500 lakh cottonseed packets of 450 grams each, MMBL supplies only 30 lakh packets or six percent of the total.  According to him even this six percent share was not achieved last year.

For Reddy this amounts to non-working of the patent and a ground for government intervention. (MMBL actually has 49 licensees of Bollgard II technology. They in turn have sub-franchisees. Last December it terminated the licenses of its biggest franchisee, Hyderabad-based Nuziveedu Seeds and its subsidiaries, Pravardhan Seeds and Prabhat Agri Biotech, for non-payment of Rs 160 cr in trait fees. According to Indian Express’ Rural Affairs Editor Harish Damodaran the sale of Bt cottonseed has increased from 1.05 lakh packets in 2002, when it was first approved, to 500 lakh packets in 2015).

The termination of licenses just before the commencement of the season (February/March) could have ‘a disastrous effect resulting in seed shortage, says Reddy. For him this is ‘ample evidence of arbitrariness and domineering behaviour of Monsanto without caring for the interest of the farmers.’

Reddy says Andhra Pradesh brought Bt cottonseed under price control in 2006. Though it fixed the trait fee for Bollgard I at Rs 50 a packet and Rs 90 a packet for Bollgard II, MMBL continued charging higher rates on the basis of court injunctions.  Currently, he says, Monsanto charges Rs 40 as trait fee in China but the rate is Rs 163.29 without taxes in India. For Reddy this is a clear violation of government orders ‘through abuse of patent rights.’

Reddy finds little difference between Bollgard I (with a single insecticidal gene) and Bollgard II (with two genes, approved for cultivation in 2006).  Monsanto introduced the latter in 2009 because the pink bollworm had developed resistance to the former. But Reddy says Bollgard I is still effective against the American bollworm, spotted bollworm and army bollworm. The detection last year of  pink bollworm’s resistance to Bollgard II in some parts of Gujarat and Maharashtra  is proof for Reddy that Bollgard II has become ‘obsolete and useless,’  and reason for farmers to be exempted from paying royalty or trait fees.

Reddy holds Bollgard II’s popularity against it. He says farmers are compelled to sow it against their wishes. If they do not, bollworms repelled from Bt cotton fields will invade their fields and destroy the crop.  He says the 90 percent plus coverage of cotton acreage with Bt seed has resulted in ‘a complete destruction of original germplasm.’  Indian farmers have switched from native varieties like Gossypium herbaceum and Gossypium arboreum to Gossypium hirsutum or American cotton because Bt technology, according to Reddy, works only on it.

(According to K R Kranthi, Director of the Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR), Nagpur, the British introduced American cotton in 1790 as it was suitable for their ginning and spinning mills. But they did not succeed in converting India to it. In 1947, when the British left, 97 percent of India’s cotton acreage was under American cotton. Though Indian varieties evolved over millions of years, are sturdy and adaptable, and yielded prized calico and muslin fabric before the industrial revolution, Kranthi says, Indian scientists declared them as inferior and coarse and focused efforts on improving American cotton. They did what the British could not. In 2000, before the introduction of Bt cotton, 28 percent of India’s cotton acreage was desi. Today it is 0.5 percent. Even Suraj, the save and sow seed variety of CICR is American cotton! -Editor).

(Top photo: Balasaheb Kakde of New Krushi Mitra Agro Agency at Ramnagar, Jalna, Maharashtra. Photo by Vivian Fernandes, 15 September, 2015).

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?