Agriculture Policy Briefing

UP’s Drive Against Slaughterhouses is Hasty and Thoughtless

A farmer examining an animal in Wardha's Hinganghat tehsil. Photo by Vivian Fernandes

Due process has not been followed in the drive against illegal slaughterhouses in Uttar Pradesh. To blame butchers and the meat industry for not complying with the law is to ignore the unhelpful attitude to business of the state’s administration. The drive will have unintended adverse consequences, says Vivian Fernandes.

If the idea behind Uttar Pradesh’s drive against illegal slaughter of animals is to ensure health, hygiene and sanitation, Chief Minister Yogi Adityananand’s administration could have made its intentions clear, simplified the compliances and given time for butchers and slaughter houses to comply, . Instead we see a repeat of the disruption of normal life that we witnessed last November when high value currently notes were pulled out of circulation. It is hard to defend illegality but in this country, and especially in Uttar Pradesh, even those who wish to abide by the law are forced to circumvent it because of onerous regulations and sloth and cussedness of the administration.

The architect Charles Correa once told me that if shops sprang up in places they were not meant to, it was a signal for planners to return to their drawing tables and amend city master plans. The law must learn from life.

Only the naive will believe that the drive against illegal slaughter of animals in UP has a benign purpose. If health, hygiene and humane treatment of animals were a concern, why close down mechanical abbatoirs? It is hard to shake off the feeling that the intention is actually to punish a community which lives off the meat trade and did not vote for the ruling party, which in turn made no attempt to reach out to it: the ruling party did not field any member of the community in the recent assembly elections.

Despite their antagonisms, latent or open, UP’s principal communities are drawn to each other through economic ties. For the meat trade to flourish the milk industry must flourish, as Indian Express notes in its editorial. If unproductive bovines cannot be culled, dairying will not be viable.  Despite the Indian affection for cows, their population is decreasing because most states restrict or ban their slaughter. There are no such constraint on buffaloes. At least not till recently.  Hence, their population has grown by a third from 84.2 million in 1992 to 108.7 million in 2012. Only a sixth of these are male. The rest are female.

In Uttar Pradesh, the buffalo population has grown from 18.99 million in 1996 to 30.62 million in 2012 ─ a jump of 61 percent. Its cattle (cows, bulls and bullocks) population declined from 20 million in 1997 to 18.88 million in 2007 before inching up to 19.55 million in 2012. Of this the share of female cattle was 75 percent.

The gender skew is not natural. It is deliberate to retain only productive, milk-giving animals.

The culling has created a vibrant export industry. In 2015-16, India exported 1.3 million tonnes of buffalo meat and products worth Rs 26,682 cr (or $ 4.08 billion at the then prevailing exchange rate of Rs 65.43 to a dollar).

The leather industry also feeds off the meat industry.

Buffalo meat is also a cheap source of protein. There are thousands of eateries that serve it as kebabs and curries.

All the four industries keep millions of people employed.

Jobs matter at a time of near jobless growth. The three years of this government have seen weak job growth despite India’s GDP rising at a fast clip. The Economic Survey has advised the government to focus on the apparel, leather and footwear sectors to keep Indians employed since rising wages has priced China out of these export markets.

The government talks of ease of doing business and maximum governance. But according to a report in the Indian Express, slaughter houses have to comply with a set of 24 regulations pertaining to treatment of animals, their movement on foot and transportation by vehicles, the discharge of effluents, the treatment of solid wastes and veterinary certification both of live animals and after slaughter.

While going overboard on its cultural agenda, the government must beware of unintended consequences. Across the country famers are complaining that because of tough laws against cattle slaughter and cow vigilantism, they cannot dispose of male and unproductive cattle and buffaloes. Neither can they afford to themselves feed them. Many of them are anguished to let cattle loose to fend for themselves. The menace of stray cattle is such that in Punjab farmers have taken to fencing off their fields at enormous cost. Cattle lying on ill-lit roads and highways are a hazard at night.

When communities are intertwined you cannot hurt one without harming the other.

(No milk without meat: A farmer examining an animal at Alipur village of Hinganghat tehsil in Maharashtra’s Wardha district. Photo by Vivian Fernandes). 

 

 

Email This Page

Leave a Comment


Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?