GM Endorsements

Safe Human Use of GE Crop Produce For Two Decades Evidence of Safety: B Sesikaran

B Sesikaran of RCGM.  Photo by Vivian Fernandes

The Chairman of the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) says genetically-engineered (GE) mustard and fruit borer resistant Bt brinjal should be released for cultivation because the safety of the two crops has been demonstrated  during confined field trials in the case of GE mustard and in farmers’ fields in Bangladesh where it is being cultivated since October 2013.

In an interview at his residence in Secunderabad, B Sesikaran said “safe human use is evidence of safety,” and GE crops have not damaged the environment or posed a threat to human and animal health in the two decades they have been cultivated since 1996. A medical pathologist by training, Sesikaran has been chairman of RCGM for the past three years. Before that, for six years he was director of Hyderabad’s National Institute of Nutrition.

RCGM is the apex technical body under the department of biotechnology in the ministry of science and technology. It prescribes protocols for research and safety trials of genetically-engineered crops.

The GE mustard awaiting regulatory approval has been developed by a team of Delhi University scientists led by geneticist and former vice-chancellor of Delhi University, Deepak Pental.  He had submitted the risk assessment dossier to the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) in late 2015, so it could recommend it for open release.  DMH-11 has missed the 2016 rabi planting season as the government has been vacillating.

As for Bt brinjal,  a moratorium on its release was imposed by then environment minister Jairam Ramesh in 2010, following noisy protests by anti-GM activists. The genetically-engineered variety has a toxic gene obtained from a soil bacterium which makes it toxic to the fruit borer but not to humans.

Bangladesh approved its cultivation in October 2013 on the basis of Indian bio-safety data. “Has anyone died?” asks Sesikaran, who laments that farmers across the border in West Bengal suffer  losses because the Bt variety has not been approved for cultivation in India.

Sesikaran says India’s regulatory system is good. Even before a genetically-engineered product  comes to the RCGM for safety tests, its usefulness and sustainability has to be established by the applicant company or institute. Though these studies are conducted by the applicants themselves,  they are reliable, he says, because the data is verifiable.

Sesikaran decried the paranoia of anti-GM activists who say experts sitting in the regulatory bodies often move to the private corporate sector, and this colours their judgement.  With this kind of suspicion “we will ultimately land up with activists as regulators.”

Email This Page

Hit Counter provided by technology news
Web Design MymensinghPremium WordPress ThemesWeb Development

I Do Not Understand Bt Cotton technology; I Know It Works

Kallanagouda PatilY Kallanagouda Patil, 46, of Uppinbetegeri village in Dharwad taluk  owns 52 acres jointly with his three brothers. He holds a diploma in agriculture from a school in Raichur. Patil grows cotton on ten acres, apart from sugarcane, potato, Bengal gram, jowar, tur,moong and vegetables. He uses groundwater to irrigate his fields. The water is drawn from a depth of 280 feet. Electricity is free so he flood irrigates the fields, except the one under banana  where he uses drip irrigation. He does not micro-irrigate cotton because it is closely planted and has to make way for another crop after eight months. This farmer has his cost all worked out. Making quick mental calculations, he estimates the cost of cotton crop at Rs 22,500 an acre and the realization from 17 quintals an acre at Rs 68,000. He had planted Bayer seed. ‘I do not understand technology, he says, all I know is if I use Bt seed there will be no

Pests Snack on Chilly But Not Cotton

RudagiF Basavaraj Rudagi, 48, did not grow cotton before 2008. This farmer from Saundhi village in Dharwad district’s Kundogol taluk made a partial switch to Bt cotton as chilly was susceptible to pest attack and yield was declining. From five acres in 2009, Rudagi had fifteen of a forty acre joint farm under cotton this year, when smartindianagriculture  caught up with him in February. He tried out Bayer in a change from Mahyco and Raasi seed. Rudagi says he got 11.5 quintals (100 kg) an acre from his rain-fed crop and at Rs 4,050 a quintal, his realization was a little over Rs 46,000. The cost, he says, is Rs 26,000 an acre, excluding rental earnings had he leased out the land. This does not mesh with the profit he claims he makes, but then he admits to not keeping crop-wise accounts. Rudagi also grows peanuts, coriander, gram, safflower and jowar. There is safety in diversity. And yes he plants pigeon pea or tur around the cotton crop for bollworms to feed on so they are not forced by the survival instinct to develop resistance to Bt protein.  In this sense he is quite a cut apart. Low cotton prices are worrying but what is the alternative?